- Total Football Analysis
- Posts
- Patrick Kluivert's Start With Indonesia & Back Three Vs Back Four - Tactical Theory
Patrick Kluivert's Start With Indonesia & Back Three Vs Back Four - Tactical Theory
Today, we have a tactical analysis piece on Patrick Kluivert's start with Indonesia along with a tactical theory piece on the considerations when choosing between a back three and a back four.
The Home Of Tactical Analysis
Transform Your Scouting with Playmaker AI – Book Your Free Demo Today! 📈
Maximize efficiency and cut scouting costs with Playmaker AI, the AI-powered football analytics platform trusted by professional clubs, scouts, and agents globally.
Save Time: Instantly identify top talent and actionable insights across hundreds of leagues.
Save Money: Reduce expensive scouting trips and enhance decision-making with precise data analytics.
Gain Tactical Advantage: Quickly access detailed player performance and tactical analysis.
Discover firsthand how PlaymakerAI can streamline your scouting process and elevate your team's performance.
Schedule a free demo of PlayMaker.AI today!
Today’s TFA Posts ⚽
Indonesia are in the football spotlight as this past international break marks the debut of their national team coach, Patrick Kluivert.
Yes, that one.
Kluivert is famous as a player, having achieved legendary status with the Netherlands national team and various clubs, including Ajax and Barcelona.
Today, we analyse Kluivert’s start with the Indonesian national team.
In modern football, the choice between a back three and a back four is crucial in shaping a team’s tactical balance.
Both formations have advantages, each offering distinct benefits depending on the team’s needs, playing style, and the match context.
A back three provides greater central coverage and depth, allowing defenders to step out and anticipate opposition movements confidently.
This setup can be particularly advantageous for teams that play high press or those who need additional cover when defending against counterattacks.
However, a back three can also be vulnerable against teams that exploit wide areas, often morphing into a back five and limiting attacking options.
This is especially evident when the wing-backs are forced to drop too deep to cover the wide spaces, leaving fewer players in attacking positions.
The system places significant responsibility on the wing-backs, demanding them to cover large distances both defensively and offensively.
On the flip side, a back four offers solidity and simplicity, ensuring balanced coverage across the pitch.
It ensures that a team has clear defensive lines in place, even against quick wingers or opponents who rely on high pressing.
However, it does require full-backs who can contribute both defensively and offensively and can struggle against teams with mobile forwards or three-man attacking lines.
Today’s tactical theory explores the key considerations when choosing between both systems.
TFA Archives 📆
Read about Bayern’s high press issues as they prepare to take on Augsburg to keep their spot at the top in a tight title race.
Learn about Franck Haise’s attacking tactics At OGC Nice as they sit in fourth and take on Nantes today.
Here’s why Udinese’s direct tactics give them a winning edge under Kosta Runjaić as they sit in 10th taking on 12th-placed Genoa.
